Once again, August threw up a very mixed bag of experiences and emotions. There have been opportunities to rest and reset and some truly joyous shared moments filled with light and laughter ... but there has also been frustration, anger and tears. September looks like it is following a similar pattern.
The more comfortable parts to write about might be the joyful bits, of which there have been plenty, and I will do that too some point soon. But the more necessary things to write about are definitely all the other stuff. All the stuff that is sapping my energy and making it that little bit harder to keep seeking out hope and light in a world that feels increasingly dark. All the stuff that feels incredibly hard to to put into words, but incredibly important to try. So here I am, trying.
Last summer threw up some exceptionally challenging moments: the depths of hate and violence we saw on our streets was terrifying, leaving many of my friends afraid to leave their homes. A year has passed. A lid was gently placed over some of that boiling fury, but, as predicted at the time when there was a failure to really unpack and deal with what was going on, instead of being dampened down, it has been fermenting. Fermenting and ripe for exploitation by those whose agenda is founded on fear, division and hate.
Overall, while we may not (yet) have seen quite the same extremes of violence as last summer, I think there are many signs that we are in a much darker place as a society, and the pace at which we have got here genuinely worries me. There are several things I feel have been more difficult to stomach this year. I have been trying (and failing) for some time to wrestle this post into coherence, so I might just leave it as snippets which don't necessarily entirely slot together in to a cohesive, well-ordered whole but which capture at least some of what I think I want to say. I know it's too long. There's a lot to say.
It may only have been lip-service but in summer 2024, my sense was that there was at least some attempt to condemn the behaviour of those spreading hate and fear about people who have arrived on our shores seeking safety. There were calls for calm, there were arrests and convictions. This year there has been a stark lack of public opposition from people in power, or indeed anyone who has been given much media coverage. Violence and hatred has been met with the suggestion that these are "legitimate concerns". Protesting outside people homes (if hotels can really be called such a thing) has been completely normalised and seemingly justified. Members of mainstream parties have joined them. Language which was the preserve of the far-right has slipped into everyday political discourse and everyday conversation.
I remember when I first noticed that the BBC had started using the term "illegal migrants" (but without the inverted commas) for people in the asylum system (quick fact check: if you live in a hotel which is being used as asylum accommodation you are, by definition, in a legal process, and not, therefore, by any reasonable definition, "illegal") and that is just one example among many.
The first campaign I was involved in after starting to volunteer at St Chad's Sanctuary was to ask for those seeking asylum to be allowed to start college without having to wait six months. At the time, it felt like an entirely reasonable and potentially achievable ask. Now it feels like cloud cuckoo land thinking.
I was going to write something about the gradual shift of what has come to be seen as acceptable, but sadly, it doesn't feel so "gradual" anymore. The Overton window has not so much drifted towards anti-migrant sentiment as hurtled there. What once felt well within the range of reasonable now seems to be considered outlandishly radical while what once felt consigned to the history books is making its way into policy. I am not sure how we slow its pace. I'm not sure how we shift it back the other way. I am not sure how we make "woke" into the compliment it ought to be.
I am not going to deny that there are people within the asylum system who are not particularly nice. I am not even going to attempt to justify it all away by trauma and circumstances, although that is often a contributory factor. The reality is there will be some asylum seekers who will commit crimes and some who are playing the system. People seeking sanctuary are no more perfect than the rest of us. They are not all heroes any more than they are all villains: they are simply humans who should be treated as such.
The same is true of people of every race and nation. Sarah Everard's murderer was a Met police officer, but no-one is standing outside police stations implying everyone on the inside is dangerous. Harold Shipman is the most prolific serial killer in British history but we don't use that as a reason to spread hate and fear of all GPs. We don't think everyone from Yorkshire should be sent back there because of the Yorkshire Ripper ...
No crime by any individual, whatever their ethnicity or immigration status should be allowed to justify the demonisation of an entire (tiny) segment of the population. Aside from that, there is zero statistical evidence to bear out the idea that increased migration has caused increased crime. On the contrary, while migration has increased in recent years, serious crime has, whatever the public perception from media coverage may be, been decreasing.
There is a reason why we have moved away from "stranger danger" messaging: and it is that it has consistently been proven that it just isn't true. If this is really about protecting women and children we need to name the fact that as a woman, you are far more likely to be killed by your partner that someone who has just arrived in our country looking for safety, as a child, you are far more likely to be harmed by a family member than someone who happens to have been made to live in a hotel in your town. We are at far greater risk from those we know and trust. Statistically, if we want someone to demonise, it should be our family and friends.
You have to hand it to the far right: their marketing strategy and ability to mobilise has been spectacularly successful. It has helped of course, that they are backed by very significant resource, but their messaging has also been very cleverly designed. They have been exceptionally adept at playing on fears and discontent and choosing images that draw people in and mobilising them.
The co-opting of the flag as a symbol to rally behind has been particularly clever. If swastikas had appeared on lampposts across the country, or big signs saying migrants out, they'd have undoubtedly been called out and hurriedly removed. It is much harder to challenge someone for flying the national flag, even if you know the reasons for raising it are not entirely innocent and are aware of the discomfort it is causing. It comes with an easy to parrot defence, which seems to have successfully taken in many 'good' people. It requires a more nuanced response which can't be captured in a social-media friendly three-word slogan.
I have heard people who I respect, even people who I have campaigned alongside on social justice issues, repeat the line that this is purely a show of patriotism and that communities should be allowed to take pride in their British identity. I have heard many people who see it as no cause for concern. I wish it was true. Don't get me wrong, I am sure there are individuals who are making less consciously informed choices, and don't fully understand the agenda behind "raising the colours", but I think we dismiss or justify it as just that at our peril. Michael Rosen's description of fascism has never felt more real, more chilling, more immediate: "I sometimes fear that people think that fascism arrives in fancy dress worn by grotesques and monsters as played out in endless re-runs of the Nazis. Fascism arrives as your friend. It will restore your honour, make you feel proud, protect your house, give you a job, clean up the neighbourhood, remind you of how great you once were, clear out the venal and the corrupt,
remove anything you feel is unlike you... It doesn't walk in saying, 'Our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations, war and persecution.' "
* * *
One of the things that saddens me about all of this, is that it is serving as a very effective distraction from the very real issues people in many of our communities (both those with migration in their recent histories and those without) are facing. Because I am not denying that many in our society are really struggling and feel genuinely disenfranchised and unheard.
I am drawing something of a distinction here, clearly, between those who, caught up in lives that are potentially far from the ideal ones they'd like to be living lack the energy and the political education to really understand what is going on here, and those who are pulling the strings behind the scenes who know exactly what they are doing and why.
The wealth of our country is being concentrated into fewer and fewer hands with the richest in our country hoarding staggering amounts of wealth, accounted for in numbers most of us can't really get our heads around. Technological change is happening at a pace none of us can keep up with or really understand, and the accompanying societal and relational changes leave many of us feeling destabilised. Housing and employment feel less secure while prices of the things we have come to see as essentials continue to rise. With climate change gaining pace, we can't even trust the weather to be its usual unpredictable self.
When everything feels like it is shifting beneath our feet, it is no surprise people want to find solid ground on which they can come to rest. When everything looks like it has become a grey area, sharp black and white is very attractive. I have spoken often of the need for all of us to find a community, a place were we feel we belong. Looking for easy solutions to complex problems isn't new. Nor is, in the face of things going wrong, looking for scapegoats and someone to blame. Nor is uniting around a common enemy: defining who is 'out' has long been a way to also define that we are 'in'.
But for as long as people are convinced that migration is the cause, they are less likely to fight for the real solutions to the real problems. And for as long as the politicians think that's what will make people vote for them, they will continue to introduce policies that will demonise people who have migrated to our country but that will make no material difference to the quality of people' lives.
People seeking sanctuary make up a tiny proportion of the UK population. The same can be said of the trans community, another group being consistently demonised. They are among the most vulnerable and powerless. They are a very easy target.
None of this has, in my opinion, happened by accident. There are people who this agenda suits exceptionally well. They are not, mostly, the people whose own lives have been pushed to the margins, who are, in some ways, as much victims of this ideology as anybody else.
This isn't about letting anyone involved in all this off the hook, but I do think that somehow the solution is in discourse not demonisation. I don't know how we facilitate that. There are a whole lot of people who aren't currently ready to for rational debate, but just angry dismissal, tempting though it is, probably isn't the solution.
* * *
If the summer has been difficult for people seeking sanctuary it isn't only because of the rhetoric out on the streets and in our social media feeds. It is also because that rhetoric is driving policy decisions in Westminster. There have been so many, one after another, that almost every day I have checked the news in trepidation wondering what hideous new policy or procedure is going to be announced today. Most feel like they are simply performative cruelty which will have no demonstrable benefits but will cause untold harm to the wellbeing of some of our most vulnerable neighbours.
Don't get me wrong: I don't want people to have to get into small boats across the channel either. Nor do I want people to be forced to live in "hotels". I want policies that genuinely challenge both of those things. I want to be able to campaign against them because we are in search of better options not worse ones. I want climate change to be taken seriously and an end to an arms trade that makes war and repression a valuable business model forcing more and more people to flee their homes. I want safe routes that stop people resorting to ever more dangerous methods to reach our shores. I want decent, community-based accommodation models and faster and fairer decision making processes to allow people to integrate. How do we get there?
* * *
One of the things I have always said to reassure friends, and perhaps myself, about the anti-migrant agenda is that while it is very real, it doesn't represent the wider British public: that overall we stand for tolerance and welcome. As the summer has worn on, I no longer feel able to be quite so confident in those assertions. I still maintain that there are plenty of people for whom this is the very antithesis of what it really means to be British, what they want the union flag to represent.
But with more and more people caught up in either participating in or justifying actions which are clearly being orchestrated (and funded) by the far right, with views once the preserve of said far right being increasingly deemed acceptable within mainstream political discourse, with people I thought of as reasonable espousing views which to my mind definitely aren't, and with the very real threat of a Reform government after our next general election, I feel less able to state confidently that these are only the views of a tiny minority.
* * *
I probably also need to acknowledge that there is a cumulative affect of the ongoing awfulness that I have watched the people I support be subjected to over the past few years. That things feel heavier now not only because, objectively, they are, but because they come not in isolation but in addition to all the stuff that has come before.
The fact that I am 'finalising' this post a couple of days after the biggest far-right anti-migration / anti-migrant march I can remember is not lost on me. The fact that even that has not been met with solid condemnation from all sides speaks, I fear, of where we are.
But this is not the end of the story, mine, or ours. Part 2 to follow ... I am not giving up.