Every Tuesday we have evening prayer and a discussion focused on next Sunday's gospel. As part of it, we take turns to prepare a short reflection on the biblical text. I'm not planning to share them all here, but this week I thought I might.
This week we reflect on Luke chapter 1 verses 26 to 38: the story of
the annunciation. It is a passage which I love. Once you get past all the
slightly kitsch images associated with it, I think it is rich and deep and
beautiful.
Like many overly familiar passages, it is easy, I think, for
some of both the promise and challenge of this encounter between Mary and God’s
messenger to get lost, consigned to being a footnote in the Christmas story, an
excuse for a blue-eyed, blond-haired angel with tinsel on their head to appear
in the nativity play.
But it is so much more than that! And there are quite a number of things I could pick out to focus on. Including this:
Gabriel’s arrival in and departure from the
scene are mentioned, but I have often wondered how long this messenger of God
stayed at Mary’s side. For me, this is much more than a mere irrelevant technicality:
it speaks to the manner and means by which God communicates with humanity. I
think we are usually tempted to assume that Gabriel stays for roughly the
length of time it takes to read this biblical passage straight through, or, at
a push, to sing the Angel Gabriel carol. It gets reduced to an instant and
immediate encounter. Mary at home, God interjects with a message, which she
hears, understands and accepts, and that’s it, done and dusted … and back to
the dusting!
In understanding it thus, it can feel so alien to our own
experiences of God, which, speaking for myself, are rarely so instantaneous,
rarely accompanied by bright flashes of light and jolly bells ringing in the
background. It becomes a beautiful story, but not one to which we easily
relate.
But what if, then, the annunciation didn’t happen like that
at all. What if the different phases of Mary’s reaction, and the different promises
offered by the angel happened not over a couple of minutes, but say a couple of
months.
What if Mary’s journey from fear, to total incomprehension,
to eventual acceptance of God’s promise and finally to her commitment to serve happened
not in the space of the few sentences to which it has been reduced but through
days or weeks of gut-wrenching prayer and struggle.
What if, even, this Gabriel, whose name means “my strength is in God”,
was not some otherworldly being but the whispered voice of her conscience
inside her head; or a friend or neighbour who accompanied her through said
struggles to understand how God was calling her to something both deeply human
and at the same time extraordinary: inviting her to bring God’s presence into
the midst of humanity.
What if, God is still sending messengers who stay for as long as they need to, and who we are more
likely to hear if we dare to strip away the glorias and the medieval art. What
if God is still calling us to things which invoke first fear, then total
incomprehension, calling us in a whispered voice to make the same final step that
Mary did … to acceptance and commitment: steps we are only able to take if we keep
listening long enough to work through the fear and incomprehension first. Steps
which lead us towards actions which may be both deeply human and at the same
time extraordinary: inviting us too to bring God’s presence into the midst of
humanity.
It may be heresy to say so, but I sometimes wonder how many
people said no before Mary dared to say yes. How many others were offered this
promise and did not hear it, or turned away from it … I can’t even say I blame
them because I’m not convinced at all I haven’t done the same at times! Not in
a “will you give birth to my son” way but in a “will you convey this promise of
God’s presence to the world around you” way.
I still have so much more to say (but I know this is already more than long enough)! Much of it is about freedom
and choice, about a call and promise which is never imposed, about possibilities
of new life.
But perhaps much of the essence is already covered here.
Because it all relates to this same idea: that in dressing this up as an ethereal
encounter, focusing on how different it looks to our reality we lose the deep
humanity of it, to which we can perhaps relate. In the church’s temptation to either
dress Mary up as pure, perfect, and ‘holier than thou’ or reduce her to a walk-on
part only really mentioned at Christmas, we lose her deep humanity, to which we
can perhaps relate.
And in so doing we lose the challenge it demands of each of us. And is so doing we also lose the promise it offers to each of us. The challenge and the promise that the incarnation, as well as being a one-off, once-for-all-time historical event is also a reality in which we are each called to play our part: giving birth to God’s presence in the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment